NEWS

Amnesty Selective, Biased, Says A-G

The latest Amnesty International report on Fiji is biased, selective and does not reflect the true position in Fiji or the great strides that we have made as a nation
06 Dec 2016 11:00
Amnesty  Selective,  Biased,  Says A-G
Amnesty International

The latest Amnesty International report on Fiji is biased, selective and does not reflect the true position in Fiji or the great strides that we have made as a nation to deal with the issue of torture, says Acting Prime Minister and Attorney-General, Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum.

Mr Sayed-Khaiyum’s comments come after a report – Beating Justice, How Fiji’s Security Forces Get away with Torture – was launched yesterday by Amnesty International at the Grand Pacific.

In a statement later, Mr Sayed-Khaiyum said: “Fiji has ratified the United Nations Convention Against Torture and our institutions and their leaders have made it clear that torture, assault and cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment of detainees will not be tolerated.

“The Prime Minister and the Police Commissioner are both on the public record as having said that there is a policy of zero tolerance for torture. And that policy is being enforced with vigour.

“It is no secret that during more turbulent times in Fiji, we had a problem with certain individuals taking the law into their own hands. But there has never been institutionalised torture in Fiji and the days in which these individuals behaved with impunity are over. Indeed, there has been no immunity in the Constitution or any other law in Fiji that applies to disciplined forces since 2014.”

Mr Sayed-Khaiyum also highlighted the selective manner in which a media release by Amnesty International reported the recent jailing of law enforcement officers in the case of Vilikesa Soko.

The media release was sent to international media as well.

“In fact, the record shows that successful prosecutions have been mounted and the perpetrators sentenced to lengthy jail terms. This is certainly the case in relation to the death in custody of Vilikesa Soko. Yet in its media release in which the Soko case is cited to support Amnesty’s case, no mention is made that members of the disciplined forces have been tried and convicted for his rape, sexual assault and also perverting the course of justice. This is clear evidence of the selective nature of Amnesty’s claims.

“Not only has Fiji embraced a policy of zero tolerance for torture and signed the UN Convention, but we are working hard with our development partners to raise standards in the Fijian Police and reduce the incidence of assault in custody. Britain and the United Nations Development Programme are working closely with the Police on a pilot programme that includes the video recording of Police interviews and “First Hour” procedures in which detainees are informed of their rights and gain access to legal representation,” the A-G said.

“This programme – which is to be implemented throughout Fiji – has been praised by UN officials and the Secretary General of the Geneva-based Association for the Prevention of Torture, Mark Thomson. Yet it is not mentioned in Amnesty’s report at all. The report also puts forward a number of generalised claims regarding

Fiji’s legal framework and processes that it fails to substantiate.

“It is a great pity that instead of highlighting these important positive developments, Amnesty has chosen to be selective in its reporting and sensationalise the issue with its headline “A darker side of paradise”.

“It is of deep concern that at no stage did Amnesty’s researcher contact the Fijian Director of Public Prosecutions, who could have provided clarity on a number of issues that were raised in the report and also outline the progress Fiji is making to dealing with complaints of alleged torture or abuse. This suggests a predetermined agenda on the part of Amnesty International to ignore the full picture and put politics before principle and objectivity.”

Amnesty International Pacific Researcher, Asia Pacific, Kate Schuetze, during the launch of the report said they started receiving information from prisoners who were beaten up.

“We also have the military intervening to protect officers from liability in the (Sakiusa) Rabaka case where a 19-year-old youth was taken up to the military barracks in early 2007 and later died from his injuries while in custody, there was an attempt to send military officers overseas to carry out peacekeeping duties during that time.”

The officer however could not travel overseas following a court order.

She said that when perpetrators were sentenced, they were given early release from Corrections facilities.

Ms Schuetze said there had been forced confessions which they had noted.

“Even with the new measures that Government is talking about, we need to think more seriously about where the facts and the measure are, how to address them,” she said.

“An open area where we can certainly assist is that we do have colleagues in Geneva in touch with the diplomatic missions, this week have passed the torture report to the Commonwealth Secretariat and to EU delegates who may be meeting the Prime Minister overseas. I think that its important especially for Fiji and small island countries.

“The perception is everything is fine, all they hear is one side when they are over there and one side they are hearing which is the Government side, we do need to raise civil society voices and individual voices and give them their space.”.

Edited by Naisa Koroi

Feedback:  arieta.vakasukawaqa@fijisun.com.fj

 

Fijisun E-edition
Total Excellium
Subscribe-to-Newspaper
Fiji Sun Instagram
Subscribe-to-Newspaper