NATION

Goundar dismisses Dutt’s redress application

Deshwar Kishore Dutt had his con­stitutional redress application dis­missed in the High Court in Lau­toka on Valentine’s Day. Dutt submitted in his application that he was arrested by the Police
17 Feb 2018 11:00
Goundar dismisses Dutt’s redress application
Deshwar Kishore Dutt in an earlier court case. Photo: Lusi Banuve

Deshwar Kishore Dutt had his con­stitutional redress application dis­missed in the High Court in Lau­toka on Valentine’s Day.

Dutt submitted in his application that he was arrested by the Police on May 24, 2017 and was detained in custody for nine days without charge till June 2, 2017 when he was charged with aggravated robbery.

He said this contravened Section 13 (I) (f) of the Constitution.

Dutt stated in court that he was assaulted by Police officers during his caution inter­view and was made to live in an oppres­sive cell condition during his detention.

He submitted that the use of force by the Police and the oppressive cell conditions contravened Section 11 (1) of the Constitu­tion.

Furthermore he said incriminating evi­dence was obtained during his prolonged detention, which he sought to exclude on the ground that the evidence was unlaw­fully obtained in contravention of his con­stitutional rights.

Lawyers for the respondents, Josefa Mai­navolau, sought for the application to be struck out on the grounds that it disclosed no reasonable cause of action and that it was an abuse of the court process.

Mr Mainavolau said there were existing alternative remedies, which had not been exhausted by Dutt.

In his decision, Justice Daniel Goundar said the only exception to the applicant’s first claim was if presentation in court within 48 hours of arrest was not reason­ably possible than the person arrested should be presented as soon as possible thereafter.

Justice Goundar said the relief sought by Dutt was misconceived.

He said the applicant was facing a seri­ous criminal charge and his trial was pending in the Magistrates Court.

“The facts and the circumstances sur­rounding the applicant’s arrest and deten­tion are disputed facts.

“The correct forum to challenge the ex­clusion of evidence on the ground of an alleged breach of the Constitution is the trial court,” Justice Goundar said.

The court dismissed Dutt’s application and told him that alternative remedies were available to him.

Edited by Naisa Koroi

Feedback: fonua.talei@fijisun.com.fj



Got A News Tip


Get updates from the Fiji Sun, handpicked and delivered to your inbox.


By entering your email address you're giving us permission to send you news and offers. You can opt-out at any time.


Sunquick
For All Fiji Sun Advertising
Fijisun E-edition
Subscribe-to-Newspaper