Rabuka's power play continues to sway his way

Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka's decision to appoint seven Opposition MPs from the Group of Nine (G9) as Ministers and Assistant Minis­ters represents an unprecedented shift in Fiji's po­litical landscape.

While the move undoubtedly reflects his political acumen, it also raises concerns about the potential implications for democratic governance.

The G9, initially formed after the deregistration of the FijiFirst party in July 2024, was an unusual politi­cal bloc. Its members had defected from the Opposi­tion caucus led by Inia Seruiratu, creating a unique scenario where MPs functioned as independents in a Parliament historically divided along party lines.

By absorbing these MPs into his coalition Government, Mr Rabuka has redefined political alliances, consoli­dating his position in a Parliament where every vote matters.

However, this strategic manoeuvre exposes ambi­guities within Fiji's 2013 Constitution. Political com­mentators have pointed out that there are no clear provisions addressing situations involving 'cross­benchers' or independent MPs crossing over to join the Government.

Section 78 of the Constitution, which outlines the role of Opposition members, does not contemplate such a scenario. While the Attorney­General, Graham Leung, argues that the Constitu­tion does not explicitly prohibit this move, the lack of clarity creates uncertainty.

This ambiguity raises several questions. Does the absence of constitutional guidance allow for un­checked political manoeuvring? Could this precedent lead to further erosion of parliamentary integrity? By granting ministerial portfolios to former opposi­tion MPs, Mr Rabuka strengthens his Government but risks creating a perception of opportunism rath­er than principled leadership.

The situation is further complicated by the poten­tial long-term impact on Fiji's political framework. Critics argue that the move is less about fostering collaboration and more about consolidating power in the lead up to the 2026 General Election. While the Constitution's silence on this matter may provide flexibility, it also opens the door to potential misuse, particularly in a context where trust in political in­stitutions remains fragile.

Ultimately, Mr Rabuka's decision paints his deter­mination to maintain control. However, it also high­lights the need for constitutional reforms to address ambiguities and safeguard against the misuse of power. Fiji's democracy is still evolving, and unchart­ed territory can either lead to progress or pitfalls. Mr Rabuka's bold gamble may strengthen his position today, but its implications for governance and trust in political processes should not be overlooked.

In navigating this new political terrain, Fiji must tread carefully to ensure that short-term political gains do not undermine the principles of democracy.

Feedback: naisak@fijisun.com.fj