Opposition warns against dismantling FICAC, cites constitutional breakdown

The Prime Minister’s reported intention to dismantle the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) has sparked strong criticism from Leader of the Opposition Inia Seruiratu, who warns of deepening instability in the country’s governance.

“We are now hearing the Prime Minister publicly state that he intends to dismantle the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption. Let me be clear, the problem is not the institution, the problem is what happens when appointments and leadership decisions are mishandled, politicised or conducted through flawed processes that erode public confidence.”

Mr Seruiratu said the country was facing an accelerating breakdown in constitutional discipline and the rule of law, which he attributed to the leadership and direction being set by the Prime Minister.

He said the Constitution was clear that the President holds a ceremonial office and must act only on the advice and recommendations of relevant constitutional authorities.

“It is therefore profoundly troubling to hear reports that when advice and recommendations have been properly made to the President, particularly recommendations of the Judicial Services Commission, the President has refused to act on that advice.”

He further alleged that the President was seeking a severance payment or compensation for the Acting Commissioner of FICAC before acting on the Judicial Services Commission’s recommendation.

“That is not within the ambit of the President to decide. The President must act in accordance with the Constitution and without delay when properly advised to do so.”

Mr Seruiratu said controversy had already surrounded appointments linked to FICAC leadership, including serious public concern about the process and credibility of those selected.

He also criticised the Prime Minister’s reported involvement in matters concerning the Fiji National University (FNU).

“FNU is a national institution. It is not a plaything of politicians. It should never be subject to impulsive directives, sudden transfers and quiet backtracking.”

Describing what he saw as a pattern, Mr Seruiratu said instability was spreading across public institutions.

“It is now becoming a distressing pattern, anything the Prime Minister touches descends into disorder. The Prime Minister must pause and reflect deeply on the magnitude of the instability and confusion his leadership is bringing upon the country.”