Murder accused tells court he does not trust lawyers

A murder accused has told the High Court in Lautoka he wants to represent himself because he does not trust lawyers.

Peceli Rokoravolo, 38, who is charged with the murder of Nadi doctor Dr Isireli Biumaitotoya, also known as Dr Leighley Darling, made his intentions known before Justice Aruna Aluthge today.

Rokoravolo allegedly committed the offence between August 31 and September 1 last year.

He told the court his experience with two lawyers in the past had been disappointing, saying they showed “poor performance” despite him paying for their services.

The State was represented by Joeli Naivalu while Legal Aid Commission lawyer Aliti Mario appeared for the accused.

Ms Mario said the matter had been pending on voir dire grounds before the commission began representing the accused.

She said the commission had tried its best to collect disclosures from previous lawyer, most of whom were engaged in matters in Suva.

“There are procedures within the Legal Aid Commission that need to be followed,” Ms Mario said.

“No person can be jumping the gun and accusing Legal Aid. We are willing to assist the accused person, but considering that he is going to withdraw from the Legal Aid Commission, we have no objection to that.”

Justice Aluthge stressed the seriousness of the charge, including the possibility of life imprisonment, and strongly advised Rokoravolo to secure legal representation.

The judge also noted any future bail application would need to be supported by new grounds.

Mr Naivalu said frequent changes in counsel were causing delays and urged Rokoravolo to make a decision regarding his legal representation.

He highlighted the volume of disclosure documents and suggested obtaining them from outgoing counsel to avoid duplication.

The court heard previous counsel may have withheld disclosures because of outstanding legal fees.

Rokoravolo told the court he had paid his previous lawyers more than $1000 to handle his case.

He also described difficulties with former lawyers, including payment issues and lack of proper representation.

The court discussed arrangements for the transfer of disclosures and stressed the importance of timely access to assist the accused in preparing for trial.

The matter was adjourned to May 26 for the defence to confirm receipt of all disclosures.

The trial is scheduled for July 6.