Tikoisuva issues stern warning to staff, Assistant DPP in hot seat
Her statement follows revelations of a Facebook post allegedly shared by Assistant DPP Laisani Tabuakoro.
Thursday 25 September 2025 | 19:00
Acting Director of Public Prosecutions Nancy Tikoisuva and Assistant Director of Public Prosecutions Laisani Tabuakuro at the High Court in Suva.
Ronald Kumar
The Acting Director of Public Prosecutions, Nancy Tikoisuva, has issued a stern warning to all her staff, ordering them not to comment on ongoing court cases on social media.
Her statement follows revelations of a Facebook post allegedly shared by Assistant DPP Laisani Tabuakoro, which has since drawn public scrutiny.
Ms Tabuakoro has since deleted the post, where she allegedly made reference to the ongoing trial of former Supervisor of Elections Mohammed Saneem, in a manner seen as allegedly pre-empting the court.
Related stories
“Let the judiciary and the criminal justice system take its natural course, without interference or undue influence,” Ms Tikoisuva said.
Acting Attorney-General Siromi Turaga also delivered a blunt reminder to public officials and civil servants, warning that such conduct could amount to contempt of court and seriously undermine public trust in the justice system.
While stressing that freedom of expression is a constitutional right, he reminded public officials to use it responsibly.
“This matter is best handled by Acting DPP Nancy Tikoisuva,” he added.
He added that every ministry and department should have a clear social media policy.
"While I do comment as a minister at times, I am cautious—this situation needed to be addressed.”
He said reckless public commentary risked eroding confidence in the judiciary.
“You cannot comment on a case before the courts. Let the prosecution present its case, then the defence. It is the court’s job to assess the evidence and deliver judgment,” he said.
Mr Turaga also hit out at Opposition Leader Inia Seruiratu and MP Jone Usamate for their recent public statements on the case, describing their actions as “a serious matter.”
“You wouldn’t speak publicly during a Great Council of Chiefs meeting mid-deliberation. The same principle applies here,” he said.
He warned that careless remarks could inflame speculation and distort public opinion before a ruling is made.
“There’s a fine line between free speech and interfering with the judicial process,” Mr Turaga said.
“Too many are caught up in political perceptions, especially of the previous government, and in doing so, risk undermining democratic principles.”
While stressing that freedom of expression is a constitutional right, he reminded public officials to use it responsibly.