Taxi operators question fairness of Government measures amid rising costs

Taxi operators are raising concerns over the fairness of Government austerity measures, saying rising operating costs continue to expose gaps in transport support.

The concerns follow measures announced by Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka amid the ongoing fuel crisis.

Fiji Taxi Association board member Bal Naidu said while the proposed 20 per cent pay cut for Members of Parliament was a positive step, it would not ease the immediate financial strain faced by operators or the public.

Fiji Taxi Association board member Bal Naidu.

Photo: Katherine Naidu

“The move is good, however its effectiveness will depend on whether it is approved and implemented. Only then can we properly assess whether it is the right decision,” Mr Naidu said.

He said the measures did not directly address the rising cost of living.

“From the perspective of the general public, the main concern is the cost of living. This pay cut alone will not reduce living expenses.”

Mr Naidu also pointed to disparities in transport support, noting that while subsidies for buses were welcomed, other operators were left out.

“Many people rely on taxis and minibuses. What provisions are being made for them?

“Taxi fares have remained unchanged for the past 14 to 16 years, despite increases in fuel prices, maintenance costs and overall operating expenses, while other modes of transport such as buses, airlines and maritime services have seen fare increases,” he said.

He highlighted ongoing regulatory challenges in seeking fare adjustments and the pressure on drivers.

“Drivers are particularly affected. They face rising fuel costs and must meet weekly payments to vehicle owners, leaving them with minimal income to support themselves and their families,” he said.

A Nawaka, Nadi resident, who requested anonymity, echoed concerns about the broader impact of the measures.

“The main question is what they will use that 20 per cent for and where it will be directed,” the resident said.

“If it is put to good use, then it is okay. Providing relief to bus operators to ensure bus fares remain stable is beneficial, but consideration should also be given to people who do not rely on buses. What support will be available for the rest of the population?”